Ecological filtering or random extinction? Beta‐diversity patterns and the importance of niche‐based and neutral processes following habitat loss

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Indirect effects of habitat loss via habitat fragmentation: A cross-taxa analysis of forest-dependent species (2020, background): “…distances (Andrén, 1994; Fahrig, 2003), which is supported by a variety of studies on species richness (e.g., Andrén, 1994; Pardini et al., 2010), community dissimilarity (e.g., Banks-Leite et al., 2014; Püttker et al., 2015), and population parameters (e.g., Püttker et al., 2011, 2013).”
Impact of landscape composition and configuration on forest specialist and generalist bird species in the fragmented Lacandona rainforest, Mexico (2015, background): “Changes in landscape composition and configuration not only alter patterns of local diversity (a), but also the composition and structure of remaining assemblages, potentially altering the species turnover (b-diversity) across multiple spatial scales (Flohre et al., 2011; Karp et al., 2012; Arroyo-R”
Biodiversity Response To Habitat Loss And Fragmentation (2017, background): “However, the relative importance of stochastic and deterministic processes to biodiversity loss following habitat loss and fragmentation is still unknown, and represents a current area of research (e.g., Karp et al., 2012; Püttker et al., 2015).”