Assimilation and Anticipation in Continuous Spoken Word Recognition

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants (2009, unknown): “Researchers have examined the effects of within-dialect variation such as tapping (e.g., McLennan, Luce, & Charles-Luce, 2003; Luce, McLennan, & Charles-Luce, 2003), stop release (Deelman & Connine, 2001), schwa deletion (LoCasto & Connine, 2002), and assimilation (Gaskell & Marslen-Wilson, 1996; G”
Perception and representation of regular variation: The case of final /t/ (2005, background): “information in the acoustic signal (Gow, 2001).”
Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners (2004, background): “…tone contours change in a predictable way according to tone context (Xu, 1994), thus making it possible for tones to be identified on-line via anticipation, rather than inferred regressively from their following context (see Gow, 2001, for a similar view in the case of phonemic assimilation).”
Eight questions about spoken-word recognition (2007, background): “…representations of onset-embedded words (e.g., cap in captain) appear to be more strongly activated than those of offset-embedded words (e.g., bone in trombone): The longer words have a greater advantage over offset- than over onset-embeddings (Luce & Lyons, 1999; Shatzman & McQueen, submitted-a).”