Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvature
By Guangsheng Bao, Yanbin Zhao, Zhiyang Teng, Linyi Yang, Yue Zhang. International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023
365 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Large language models (LLMs) have shown the ability to produce fluent and cogent content, presenting both productivity opportunities and societal risks. To build trustworthy AI systems, it is imperative to distinguish between machine-generated and human-authored content. The leading zero-shot detector, DetectGPT, showcases commendable performance but is marred by its intensive computational costs. In this paper, we introduce the concept of conditional probability curvature to elucidate discrepancies in word choices between LLMs and humans within a given context. Utilizing this curvature as a foundational metric, we present **Fast-DetectGPT**, an optimized zero-shot detector, which substitutes DetectGPT's perturbation step with a more efficient sampling step. Our evaluations on various datasets, source models, and test conditions indicate that Fast-DetectGPT not only surpasses DetectGPT by a relative around 75% in both the white-box and black-box settings but also accelerates the detection process by a factor of 340, as detailed in Table 1. See \url{https://github.com/baoguangsheng/fast-detect-gpt} for code, data, and results.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85664bb73d09a20f4d3f7aae81143c0f25060fbb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
Citations in the corpus
- Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text (2024, positive): “We use the state-of-the-art open source detector Ghost-buster (Verma et al., 2023), the commercially deployed GPTZero 1 , DetectGPT (Mitchell et al., 2023) and its efficient version Fast-DetectGPT (Bao et al., 2023) and finally DNA-GPT (Yang et al., 2023b) to compare detection performance across var”