Biological Conceptualizations of Mental Disorders Among Affected Individuals: A Review of Correlates and Consequences

By Matthew S. Lebowitz. 2014

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8531ccfe2b399dad170c3ac4e834dc9d2cfdaac9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. E. Kvaale
2. Nick Haslam

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Nick Haslam
2. E. Kvaale

In Social Psychology

1. Nick Haslam
2. E. Kvaale
3. Brock Bastian
4. S. Loughnan
5. Adam Waytz
6. Yoshihisa Kashima
7. P. Bain
8. Nicholas Epley

Citations in the corpus

• Biogenetic Explanations of Mental Disorder (2015, background): “Regrettably, the research evidence fails to support this hopeful possibility (see Lebowitz, 2014, for a review). People who hold biogenetic explanations for their psychological problems are more likely to be pessimistic about recovery and less likely to see value in psychological interventions. In a”
• Concept Creep: Psychology's Expanding Concepts of Harm and Pathology (2016, background): “There is evidence that people understand their psychological problems as psychiatric diseases tend to be more pessimistic about recovery and less confident of their capacity to exert control over their difficulties (Haslam & Kvaale, 2015; Lebowitz, 2014).”