Observations of feedback from radio-quiet quasars – II. Kinematics of ionized gas nebulae

By Guilin Liu, N. Zakamska, Jenny E. Greene, N. Nesvadba, Xin Liu. 2013

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The prevalence and energetics of quasar feedback is a major unresolved problem in galaxy formation theory. In this paper, we present Gemini Integral Field Unit observations of ionized gas around eleven luminous, obscured, radio-quiet quasars at z~0.5 out to ~15 kpc from the quasar; specifically, we measure the kinematics and morphology of [O III]5007 emission. The round morphologies of the nebulae and the large line-of-sight velocity widths (with velocities containing 80% of the emission as high as 1000 km/s combined with relatively small velocity difference across them (from 90 to 520 km/s) point toward wide-angle quasi-spherical outflows. We use the observed velocity widths to estimate a median outflow velocity of 760 km/s, similar to or above the escape velocities from the host galaxies. The line-of-sight velocity dispersion declines slightly toward outer parts of the nebulae (by 3% per kpc on average). The majority of nebulae show blueshifted excesses in their line profiles across most of their extents, signifying gas outflows. For the median outflow velocity, we find a kinetic energy flow between 4x10^{44} and 3x10^{45} erg/s and mass outflow rate between 2000 and 20000 Msun/yr. These values are large enough for the observed quasar winds to have a significant impact on their host galaxies. The median rate of converting bolometric luminosity to kinetic energy of ionized gas clouds is ~2%. We report four new candidates for "super-bubbles" -- outflows that may have broken out of the denser regions of the host galaxy.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/852e1777756118c439e5c1dcdf08b24430c2643d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. R. Maiolino
  5. W. N. Brandt
  6. H. Netzer
  7. R. Dav'e
  8. C. Faucher-Giguére

In Instrumentation

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. R. Maiolino
  5. H. Netzer
  6. W. N. Brandt
  7. R. Dav'e
  8. F. Mannucci

Citations in the corpus