From WER and RIL to MER and WIL: improved evaluation measures for connected speech recognition
By A. Morris, V. Maier, Phil D. Green. Interspeech, 2004
358 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8516531ff3bd874b66b811f0bd4e21a2d6b10e54
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Signal Processing
Citations in the corpus
- Using IPA-Based Tacotron for Data Efficient Cross-Lingual Speaker Adaptation and Pronunciation Enhancement (2020, methodology): “Then, we computed the WER and MER [15] for the ASR model’s output, the original file, and the generated speech from a model in one of the transfer learning models.”
- Human Evaluation and Correlation with Automatic Metrics in Consultation Note Generation (2022, neutral): “They include: Levenshtein edit distance (Levenshtein et al., 1966), WER (Su et al., 1992), MER and WIL (Morris et al., 2004).”
- EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Models (2023, methodology): “Then, we calculate Word Error Rate (WER) [30], Normalized Edit Distance (NED) [51], Character Error Rate (CER) [38], and finally we average these three score to get the OCR-Score.”