Trends in household survey nonresponse: a longitudinal and international comparison

By E. D. Leeuw, W. D. Heer. 2002

754 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Unit Nonresponse and Weighting Adjustments: A Critical Review (2013, background): “Deming (1953) explicitly considers units with zero response propensities.”
Using proxy measures and other correlates of survey outcomes to adjust for non‐response: examples from multiple surveys (2010, background): “Household surveys in many countries have witnessed a decline in response rates over the past few decades (Atrostic et al., 2001; Curtin et al., 2005; De Leeuw and DeHeer, 2002).”
Solidarity and Conflict Between Adult Children and Parents: A Latent Class Analysis (2006, background): “Response rates in the Netherlands tend to be lower than elsewhere and they seem to be declining over time (De Leeuw & De Heer, 2001).”
The Impact of Lottery Incentives on Student Survey Response Rates (2003, background): “But as the use of student and alumni data have increased, response rates to surveys have been falling in surveys of the general population (Bradburn 1992; de Leeuw and Heer, 2002; Smith, 1995; Steeh, 1981) as well as student surveys (Dey, 1997).”