Dynamics of bubble breakup in a microfluidic T-junction divergence

By Taotao Fu, Youguang Ma, D. Funfschilling, Huaizhi Li. 2011

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8512a912c5422523c4188f7ae17ba13b7c7b6811

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. C. Kleijn
2. Yongping Chen
3. Zilong Deng
4. M. Kreutzer
5. V. Steijn

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. C. Kleijn
2. Duong A. Hoang
3. Yongping Chen
4. Zilong Deng
5. M. Kreutzer
6. V. Steijn
7. Luis M. Portela

Citations in the corpus

• Dynamics of droplet breakup in a T-junction (2013, background): “These results are in line with the experimental observations by Jullien et al. (2009) and Fu et al. (2011).”
• Hydrodynamics of a droplet passing through a microfluidic T-junction (2017, methodology): “In contrast, the boundaries between breakup and non-breakup shift significantly to small l0/w with increasing viscosity ratio, which is consistent with the numerical results (De Menech 2006; Afkhami et al. 2011) and experimental results (Jullien et al. 2009; Fu et al. 2011).”
• Benchmark numerical simulations of segmented two-phase flows in microchannels using the Volume of Fluid method (2013, background): “A comparison of the evolution of the neck thickness shows a good agreement between numerical data (open symbols) and experimental data (closed symbols) [53] for two cases: (l0=w 1⁄4 4:13; Ca 1⁄4 9:8 10 , squares) and (l0=w 1⁄4 3:39; Ca 1⁄4 1:2 10 , circles).”