Tolerance of Gentianella campestris in relation to damage intensity: an interplay between apical dominance and herbivory

By A. Huhta, T. Lennartsson, J. Tuomi, P. Rautio, K. Laine. Evolutionary Ecology, 2000

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Grazing tolerance of Gentianella amarella and other monocarpic herbs: why is tolerance highest at low damage levels? (2003, background): “These species are Gentianella campestris (Huhta et al. 2000b), Erysimum strictum and Rhinanthus minor (Huhta et al.”
Herbivore‐induced indirect interaction webs on terrestrial plants: the importance of non‐trophic, indirect, and facilitative interactions (2008, background): “Because these responses are very costly for plants, heavy herbivory largely prevents plants from compensating for damaged parts (Whitham et al., 1991; Huhta et al., 2000).”
COMPENSATION FOR HERBIVORY IN WILD SUNFLOWER: RESPONSE TO SIMULATED DAMAGE BY THE HEAD‐CLIPPING WEEVIL (2002, background): “…shoots breaks apical dominance, which, in turn, allows branching and confers tolerance (Paige and Whitham 1987, Maschinski and Whitham 1989, Prins and Verkaar 1989, Doak 1991, Tuomi et al. 1994, Bergelson et al. 1996, Juenger and Bergelson 1997, Lennartsson et al. 1998, Huhta et al. 2000b).”
Understanding mutualism when there is adaptation to the partner (2005, background): “Increased seed production in overcompensating plants often results from the release of apical dominance and from the production of numerous tillers (Paige & Whitham 1987; Benner 1988; Lennartsson et al . 1997, 1998; Paige 1999; Strauss & Agrawal 1999; Huhta et al . 2000b; Juenger et al . 2000).”