Do decentralized innovation systems promote agricultural technology adoption? Experimental evidence from Africa

By Haki Pamuk, Erwin H. Bulte, Adewale A. Adekunle. 2014

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84fde2fac0528d8c866c1a1bb7f590004ec74eac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. L. Klerkx
2. C. Leeuwis
3. Mariette Mc Campbell
4. K. Atta-Krah
5. I. Ogbonna
6. Jessica Zhu
7. P. Kaushik
8. D. Lamers

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. L. Klerkx
2. M. Schut
3. C. Leeuwis
4. Jessica Zhu
5. Valerie Mueller
6. Florence Kondylis
7. H. El Bilali

In Information Systems

1. C. Leeuwis
2. M. Schut
3. Valerie Mueller
4. L. Klerkx

Citations in the corpus

• INNOVATION PLATFORMS: EXPERIENCES WITH THEIR INSTITUTIONAL EMBEDDING IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT (2015, background): “I N T RO D U C T I O N IPs are increasingly seen as a promising vehicle for agricultural innovation in developing countries (Adekunle and Fatunbi, 2012; Kilelu et al., 2013; Ngwenya and Hagmann, 2011; Pamuk et al., 2014; Swaans et al., 2014; van Mierlo and Totin, 2014; van Paassen et al., 2014).”
• Seeing is Believing? Evidence from an Extension Network Experiment (2014, background): “The system assumes that information flows linearly: agricultural innovations are created by researchers, then distributed by extension workers, and finally adopted by producers (Pamuk et al., 2014).”