What Is It like to Feel Another’s Pain?*

By Frédérique de Vignemont, Pierre Jacob. Philosophia Scientiæ, 2012

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84e13165f1c08bf0d5340aab2b65027c74bb8fc9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Shaun Gallagher
2. H. Maibom
3. E. D. Di Paolo
4. T. Buhrmann
5. Thomas Fuchs
6. Hanne De Jaegher
7. Elisabeth Pacherie
8. H. Ehrsson

In Psychiatry and Mental health

1. Shaun Gallagher
2. H. Maibom

In Social Psychology

1. Shaun Gallagher
2. H. Maibom
3. E. D. Di Paolo
4. H. Ehrsson
5. Jean Decety
6. ChrisD . Frith
7. C. Farrer
8. David R. Vago

Citations in the corpus

• The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy (2017, methodology): “To sum up, on Smith’s proposal (as well as on many others’, including, for instance, de Vignemont and Jacob (2012)), empathy involves sharing (and some amount of projection), it is restricted to affective states, and it has no foundational role to play in social cognition.”
• Empathy, Simulation, and Narrative (2012, background): “De Vignemont and Jacob contend that the capacity for creating vicarious experiences is based on what Goldman calls e-imagination, which, as we’ve seen, involves the running of off-line, high-level (i.e., explicit, conscious) simulations (de Vignemont and Jacob 2012; Jacob 2011).”