Texture interactions determine perceived contrast
By C. Chubb, G. Sperling, J. Solomon. 1989
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Matteo Carandini
- David J. Heeger
- Jing Xing
- D. Tadin
- Yury Petrov
- Alexander A. Petrov
- Jejoong Kim
- M. Doop
Citations in the corpus
- Normalization as a canonical neural computation (2011, background): “The simultaneous contrast–contrast illusion, for example, is created by surrounding a central texture patch with a textured backgroun”
- Weakened Center-Surround Interactions in Visual Motion Processing in Schizophrenia (2006, background): “In some cases, contextual interactions can affect the appearance of visual stimuli (e.g., contrast) (Chubb et al., 1989), implying that, in those cases, abnormally weak contextual modulations might counterintuitively yield a veridical perception of the affected stimulus property.”
- The dynamics of perceptual learning: an incremental reweighting model. (2005, background): “In line with physiological and psychophysical evidence, the normalization term in the model is assumed to be essentially independent of orientation and modestly tuned for spatial frequency (Cannon & Fullenkamp, 1991; Carandini et al., 1997; Chubb, Sperling, & Solomon, 1989; Heeger, 1992).”
- The lateral inhibition of perceived contrast is indifferent to on-center/off-center segregation, but specific to orientation. (1993, unknown): “One way of understanding the results of Chubb et al. (1989) is to suppose that the output values produced by the filters in these arrays are subject to lateral inhibition from other filters in the same array.”
- Two Distinct Mechanisms of Suppression in Human Vision (2005, background): “, 2003), whereas studies in the periphery have noted that adjacent targets suppress sensitivity (Chubb et al., 1989; Solomon et al., 1993; Wilkinson et al., 1997; Snowden and Hammett, 1998; Xing and Heeger, 2001; Zenger-Landolt and Koch, 2001).”
- Weak suppression of visual context in chronic schizophrenia. (2005, background): “Figure 1A illustrates how contextual suppression can influence normal visual perception by causing the ringed target to appear lower contrast when presented within a high-contrast surround than in isolation [7].”
- Measurement and modeling of center-surround suppression and enhancement. (2001, background): “When contrast is suppressed , for example, the bright points of the central texture patch appear dimmer and its dark points appear lighter (Chubb, Sperling, & Solomon, 1989; Cannon & Fullenkamp, 1991, 1993, 1996; Ejima & Takahashi, 1985; Snowden & Hammett, 1998).”