A comparison of Bayesian spatial models for disease mapping
By N. G. Best, Sylvia Richardson, A. Thomson. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 2005
550 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Epidemiology, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84cea03ecd4fdc34a7244d94e52ecffc2bbc3a21
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Daniel P. Simpson
- Andrea Riebler
- Sigrunn Holbek Sørbye
- Håvard Rue
- Finn Lindgren
- Thomas Kneib
- Andrew M. Stuart
- Ludwig Fahrmeir
In Epidemiology
In Statistics and Probability
- Andrea Riebler
- Daniel P. Simpson
- Håvard Rue
- Sigrunn Holbek Sørbye
- Lucia Russo
- Constantinos I. Siettos
- Finn Lindgren
- Ludwig Fahrmeir
Citations in the corpus
- An intuitive Bayesian spatial model for disease mapping that accounts for scaling (2016, methodology): “…have been proposed, see for example Leroux et al. [4], Stern and Cressie [5] and Dean et al. [6] The appropriateness and behaviour of different latent spatial models have been compared in a full Bayesian context [7, 8, 9, 2], an empirical Bayes setting [10] or using penalized quasi likelihood [4].”
- Mathematical modeling of infectious disease dynamics (2013, background): “[58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] Most of the infectious diseases result to strong spatio-temporal patterns whose systematic analysis is of outmost importance for better understanding, predicting and combating outbreaks.”