Refined beam elements with arbitrary cross-section geometries
By Erasmo Carrera, Gaetano Giunta, P. Nali, Marco Petrolo. 2010
288 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84c472fbd3ebd6551bdd79b6982e0b74199852c0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
- Alfonso Pagani
- Erasmo Carrera
- Enrico Zappino
- Marco Petrolo
- Nasim Fallahi
- Xiangyang Xu
- Hao Yang
- A. G. D. Miguel
In Mechanics of Materials
- Alfonso Pagani
- Erasmo Carrera
- Enrico Zappino
- Marco Petrolo
- Nasim Fallahi
- Xiangyang Xu
- Hao Yang
- A. G. D. Miguel
Citations in the corpus
- Efficient CUF-based FEM analysis of thin-wall structures with Lagrange polynomial expansion (2020, methodology): “Hence, this formulation has been successfully applied to beam models having a cross-section with an arbitrary geometry [37].”
- Refined 1D Finite Elements for the Analysis of Secondary, Primary, and Complete Civil Engineering Structures (2015, background): “• As shown in Carrera and Petrolo (2012a), CW models can be easily enhanced by enriching the displacement field, i.”
- Performance of CUF Approach to Analyze the Structural Behavior of Slender Bodies (2012, unknown): “In the framework of the CUF (Carrera 2002, 2003; Carrera and Giunta 2010; Carrera et al. 2010a, b; Carrera and Petrolo 2011), the displacement field is assumed as an expansion in terms of generic functions, F τ as follows: where F τ = functions of coordinates x and z on the cross section; u τ =…”
- Static analysis of laminated beams via a unified formulation (2011, unknown): “[2].”
- Refined One-Dimensional Formulations for Laminated Structure Analysis (2012, methodology): “For the sake of brevity, a more detailed overview on CUF is not reported here, but more details can be found in [59,64].”
- Analysis of reinforced and thin-walled structures by multi-line refined 1D/beam models (2013, unknown): “The strength of CUF TE 1D models in dealing with arbitrary geometries, thin-walled structures and identifying local effects is well known for both static [33, 34] and free-vibration analysis [35, 36, 37].”
- Use of Lagrange multipliers to combine 1D variable kinematic finite elements (2013, methodology): “In static [22, 23] and free-vibration analysis [24, 25], the strength of CUF TE models in dealing with arbitrary geometries, thin-walled structures and local effects was evident.”
- Static and free vibration analysis of laminated beams by refined theory based on Chebyshev polynomials (2015, unknown): “A more detailed explanation of CUF fundamental nuclei and assembly procedure can be found in [59, 50].”
- Refined dynamic stiffness elements applied to free vibration analysis of generally laminated composite beams with arbitrary boundary conditions (2014, unknown): “The strength of CUF TE 1D models in dealing with arbitrary geometries, thin-walled structures and identifying local effects are well known for both static [28,29] and free-vibration analysis [30–32].”
- Hierarchical theories for the free vibration analysis of functionally graded beams (2011, unknown): “[14]) and thin-walled (see Giunta et al.”