Simulation of Buoyancy Driven Bubbly Flow: Established Simplifications and Open Questions (Journal Review)

By A. Sokolichin, G. Eigenberger, A. Lapin. 2004

348 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84a8dce2fe57a3a62898fe6aeb359eaaaff99db2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Qingshan Huang
2. Swarnendu Roy
3. J. Joshi
4. Mandar V. Tabib
5. Chao Yang
6. Poo Balan Ganesan
7. M. Pourtousi
8. Jaya N. Sahu

In Computational Mechanics

1. Qingshan Huang
2. Z. Mao
3. Gengzhi Yu
4. Fabián A. Bombardelli
5. Swarnendu Roy
6. J. Joshi
7. Mandar V. Tabib
8. Chao Yang

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Swarnendu Roy
2. J. Joshi
3. Mandar V. Tabib

Citations in the corpus

• CFD simulation of hydrodynamics and mass transfer in an internal airlift loop reactor using a steady two-fluid model (2010, background): “25 m/s (Sokolichin et al., 2004). The fact that the liquid velocity in the downcomer is bigger than the slip velocity of bubbles in this regime has already been verified by van Baten and Krishna (2003) with experimental data and this can be explained by the balance of forces exerted on bubbles.”
• CFD simulation of bubble column—An analysis of interphase forces and turbulence models (2008, methodology): “Although esearchers have carried out both 2D [8,11,12,14,20–26] as ell as 3D [10,11,19,24,29–31] Euler–Euler CFD simulations, he results of 3D CFD simulations were found to give good greements with the experimental results [11,13,20,24,32,33].”
• Two-phase modeling of turbulence in dilute sediment-laden, open-channel flows (2009, background): “Most of the available information for two-phase flows comes from bubbly flows (see for instance [4,61,62]).”