Identifying sandeel Ammodytes marinus sediment habitat preferences in the marine environment

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Microhabitat use and prey capture of a bottom-feeding top predator, the European shag, shown by camera loggers (2008, background): “Sampling of sandy sediments around the Isle of May indicates that sandeel density is highly variable, but can reach 60 to 80 fish m–2 (Holland et al. 2005), representing high-quality localised feeding patches for shags.”
Taking account of catchability in groundfish survey trawls: implications for estimating demersal fish biomass (2007, background): “However, even in that situation, odds ratios could be calculated (Fleiss, 1981; Tollit et al., 1997; Holland et al., 2005).”
Contrasting foraging tactics by northern gannets (Sula bassana) breeding in different oceanographic domains with different prey fields (2007, unknown): “Following on this, it is quite plausible that gannets from Bonaventure fed on capelin and sandlance in shallower water to the south of the colony as both Wsh species are strongly related to the sea bottom (Holland et al. 2005; Davoren et al. 2006).”