Identifying priority areas for reducing species vulnerability to climate change

By Neville D. Crossman, Brett A. Bryan, David McCulloch Summers. 2012

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Aim  The dimensions of species vulnerability to climate change are complex, and this impedes efforts to provide clear advice for conservation planning. In this study, we used a formal framework to assess species vulnerability to climate change quantifying exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity and then used this information to target areas for reducing vulnerability at a regional scale.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8469ad765fcbefb4c93118fcb43513e9d0c3493e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Neville D. Crossman
2. Rob Alkemade

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Neville D. Crossman
2. Joachim Maes
3. E. Drakou
4. Rob Alkemade

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Benjamin Burkhard
2. Neville D. Crossman
3. Joachim Maes
4. Rob Alkemade

Citations in the corpus

• A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services (2013, background): “There have also been a number of reviews (Egoh et al., 2012, Martı́nez-Harms and Balvanera, 2012), special issues of journals (Burkhard et al., 2012a, Crossman et al., 2012b) and books (Kareiva et al., 2011) on ecosystem services quantification, modelling and mapping.”