When to use public information for breeding habitat selection? The role of environmental predictability and density dependence

By B. Doligez, C. Cadet, Etienne G. J. Danchin, T. Boulinier. 2003

330 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8455d863aedec5cc0a07a50db493addabcc72567

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Nest predation research: recent findings and future perspectives (2015, background): “two strategies may co-occur (Doligez et al. 2003) or the latter may supplement personal success, especially in colonial breeders (Boulinier and Danchin 1997).”
Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics (2005, background): “…future environmental conditions can be predicted on the basis of the current conditions, and so condition-dependent dispersal may evolve, with dispersal cueing on the environmental parameters correlating with patch quality (Scheiner, 1993; Danchin, Heg & Doligez, 2001; Doligez et al., 2003).”
From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: a review of public information use (2007, unknown): “This idea was first modeled by Boulinier and Danchin (1997) and has been extended by Danchin et al. (2001), Doligez et al. (2003), and Parejo et al. (2004).”
Making habitat selection more “familiar”: a review (2011, background): “Doligez et al. (2003) explored how experienced breeders might select a breeding habitat, modeling five scenarios.”
Assessment of hypotheses about dispersal in a long-lived seabird using multistate capture–recapture models (2004, background): “if the habitat is of higher quality in year t, the probability that quality will be high in year t + 1 is sufficiently high; see Doligez et al. 2003 for additional information).”
Dispersal and recruitment during population growth in a colonial bird, the great cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis (2007, unknown): “dependence effects (Doligez et al. 2003).”
Prospecting in the collared flycatcher: gathering public information for future breeding habitat selection? (2004, background): “Information derived from the reproductive performance of conspecifics in a patch, that is, ‘public information’ (Valone & Giraldeau 1993), is thought to provide highly reliable cues about local patch quality for breeding habitat choice in the following year(s) (Danchin et al. 1998, 2001; Brown et al”
Group size and ectoparasitism affect daily survival probability in a colonial bird (2004, background): “C. R. Brown ()) · M. B. Brown Department of Biological Sciences, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104, USA e-mail: charles-brown@utulsa.edu because it represents a single index of the many positive and negative factors associated with a particular habitat (e.g., Danchin and Wagner 1997; Danchin et a”
Sociable schedules: interplay between avian seasonal and social behaviour (2006, background): “the choice of particular resources) rather than by social benefits (Danchin & Wagner 1997; Wagner et al. 2000; Schjørring 2001; Doligez et al. 2003).”
Research Needs and Recommendations for the use of Conspecific-Attraction Methods in the Conservation of Migratory Songbirds (2010, background): “In general, whether individuals benefit from delayed advantages depends on their longevity and the temporal autocorrelation of the environment (see literature on public information, e.g., Doligez et al. 2003).”
Effects of group size and personality on social foraging: the distribution of sheep across patches (2009, background): “In group-living species, individual decision making is also influenced by conspecific attraction (Beauchamp et al. 1997; Doligez et al. 2003; Danchin et al. 2004; Fletcher 2006), which has been shown to affect resource selection in several taxa, such as insects (Blatella germanica Ame et al.”
Impact of food predictability on social facilitation by foraging scavengers (2010, background): “Indeed, using social information usually results in higher aggregation than using personal information, whether when foraging (Skogland 1985; Shrader et al. 2007) or choosing breeding habitat (Doligez et al. 2003).”