Assessing the Performance of Natural Resource Systems

By B. Campbell, Jeffrey A. Sayer, P. Frost, Sonja J. Vermeulen, M. R. Pérez, Anthony Cunningham, R. Prabhu. 2002

250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/844e991c00a1267c83c6fc0413fe004327d98f17

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Chemistry

1. M. Rudd

In Global and Planetary Change

1. A. Angelsen
2. B. Campbell
3. M. Rudd
4. Sven Wunder
5. R. Plummer
6. T. Sunderland
7. D. Armitage
8. J. Sayer

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. A. Angelsen
2. M. Rudd
3. Sven Wunder
4. D. Armitage
5. R. Plummer
6. S. Engel
7. E. Gómez‐Baggethun
8. S. Pagiola

Citations in the corpus

• Research to integrate productivity enhancement, environmental protection, and human development. (2002, background): “…to analyze different scenarios, to form the basis of decision support systems, to assist in stakeholder negotiations, to identify systems performance indicators and to assist in evaluation of impacts (Campbell et al. 2001, Lal et al. 2001, Lynam et al. 2002, van Noordwijk et al. 2001).”
• A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world (2007, methodology): “Trends in resource management and co-operative governance underscore the need for evaluation to also be based on complexity thinking (Innes and Booher, 1999a; Bellamy et al., 2001; Campbell et al., 2001; Connick and Innes, 2003; Anderies et al., 2004).”
• Household livelihoods in semi-arid regions: options and constraints (2002, unknown): “Weakness of local institutions and high transaction costs, however, make it difficult to manage common pool resources as new pressures emerge (Campbell et al. 2001b).”
• Livelihood strategies and forest dependence: New insights from Bolivian forest communities (2013, methodology): “We applied the sustainable livelihood framework for the analysis of strategies and assets (Bebbington, 1999; Ashley and Hussein, 2000; Campbell et al., 2001; Dorward et al., 2009; Babulo et al., 2008).”
• Building livelihood resilience: what role does agroforestry play? (2019, methodology): “forest resources, farmland, and grazing areas (Campbell et al., 2002; Erenstein et al., 2010).”
• Forest Clearing in Rural Livelihoods: Household-Level Global-Comparative Evidence (2014, background): “…framework The livelihoods framework (LF) (e.g., Ellis, 2000b) is frequently used by conservation and development researchers and practitioners (Campbell et al., 2001), including for analyzing rural household economic strategies (Ellis & Bahiigwa, 2003), migration (Ellis, 2003), coastal and…”
• An institutional framework for designing and monitoring ecosystem-based fisheries management policy experiments (2004, methodology): “Capital stocks are used in the SL framework 10 (Ashley and Carney, 1999; Bebbington, 1999; Bossell, 1999; Prabhu et al., 1999; Campbell et al., 2001) and, given the historical emphasis of IAD research on the production and allocation of CPRs, a modification of the original IAD framework to…”
• Integrating “livelihoods” into integrated water resources management: taking the integration paradigm to its logical next step for developing countries (2005, background): “Putting the persons managing agricultural and natural resources, including water, at the center of attention and underlining the means they need to have at their disposal for improved management, emphasizes ‘livelihoods’ of individuals and communities (e.g., Campbell et al. 2001).”