Real versus imagined locomotion: A [18F]-FDG PET-fMRI comparison
By C. Fougère, A. Zwergal, A. Rominger, S. Förster, G. Fesl, M. Dieterich, Thomas Brandt, M. Strupp, P. Bartenstein, K. Jahn. NeuroImage, 2010
401 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/844b795767b7c382808cc866ffe0c74742f706d4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Gernot R. Müller-Putz
- Reinhold Scherer
- Christa Neuper
- Teodoro Solis-Escalante
- Johanna Wagner
- Peter Grieshofer
- Gert Pfurtscheller
- Brendan Z. Allison
Citations in the corpus
- Level of participation in robotic-assisted treadmill walking modulates midline sensorimotor EEG rhythms in able-bodied subjects (2012, background): “…emission tomography (PET) studies have tried to measure brain activity before and after walking (Fukuyama et al., 1997; Hanakawa et al., 1999; la Fougere et al., 2010), and have revealed that besides medial primary sensorimotor areas, also the premotor cortex, parietal cortex, basal ganglia and…”
- Electrocortical activity is coupled to gait cycle phase during treadmill walking (2011, neutral): “…found that imagined 20-s bouts of walking beginning from stance activated an indirect pathway via the supplementary motor cortex and basal ganglia loop, while 20 min of real steady speed walking activated a direct corticospinal pathway via the primary motor cortex (la Fougere et al., 2010).”