Literature Review of Frameworks for Macro-indicators

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Tools for Composite Indicators Building (2005, background): “Andrew Sharpe (2004) notes: “The aggregators believe there are two major reasons that there is value in combining indicators in some manner to produce a bottom line.”
On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness (2018, background): “Since the latest reviews on the methodological framework of composite indices were published a decade ago (Booysen 2002; Saisana and Tarantola 2002; Freudenberg 2003; Sharpe 2004; Nardo et al.”
Global Insights Based on the Multidimensional Energy Poverty Index (MEPI) (2013, background): “Two schools of thought clash, that of the “aggregators” versus that of the “non-aggregators” [9].”
Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide (2008, result): “(Sharpe, 2004) According to other commentators: "[…] it is hard to imagine that debate on the use of composite indicators will ever be settled […] official statisticians may tend to resent composite indicators, whereby a lot of work in data collection and editing is "wasted" or "hidden" behind a…”