Local habitat restoration in streams: Constraints on the effectiveness of restoration for stream biota

By N. Bond, P. S. Lake. 2003

320 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/842fda92cdd19c02f0376b0e95cc6f8611aa62b2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Heino
2. Luis Mauricio Bini
3. T. Erős
4. J. Soininen
5. Adriano S. Melo
6. J. Alahuhta
7. P. Haase
8. J. Tonkin

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Heino
2. J. Soininen
3. T. Erős
4. Luis Mauricio Bini
5. J. Alahuhta
6. Adriano S. Melo
7. T. Datry
8. P. Haase

Citations in the corpus

• Integrating dispersal proxies in ecological and environmental research in the freshwater realm (2017, background): “696 697 Restoration practices may not attain the planned objectives, or only attain them after long 698 periods, if species are not able to colonize restored habitats in a strongly human-impacted 699 landscape (Bond and Lake 2003; Tonkin et al. 2014; Barton et al. 2015b).”
• Spawning habitat of Atlantic salmon and brown trout: general criteria and intragravel factors (2008, background): “…connectivity of rivers also requires consideration of the sensitivity of spawning success and embryo development to critical habitat bottlenecks (Nehring and Anderson, 1993; Bardonnet and Bagliniére, 2000), not just restoring the physical habitat for juvenile fishes (Bond and Lake, 2003).”
• Barriers to the recovery of aquatic insect communities in urban streams (2006, background): “Bond & Lake (2003) suggested that ecological processes such as dispersal and recruitment might limit biotic responses to physically restored streams; however, their importance for colonisation of urban streams by aquatic invertebrate taxa has received little attention.”
• Process-Based Ecological River Restoration: Visualizing Three-Dimensional Connectivity and Dynamic Vectors to Recover Lost Linkages (2006, background): “For example, instream structures used in some restoration projects have not been recolonized because of a limited pool of potential colonizers in nearby intact sites or because of barriers to dispersal of the colonizers (Bond and Lake 2003).”
• Dispersal distance and the pool of taxa, but not barriers, determine the colonisation of restored river reaches by benthic invertebrates (2014, background): “Given the dependence on the river network for dispersal, hydrologic connectivity has been recognised as one of the key areas requiring restoration effort (Bernhardt & Palmer, 2011) and consideration for restoration projects to have a chance of success (Bond & Lake, 2003).”