Mechanism Design via Differential Privacy
By Frank McSherry, Kunal Talwar. 2007
360 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Management Science and Operations Research
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Daniel Kifer
- Kamalika Chaudhuri
- Gilles Barthe
- Justin Hsu
- Marco Gaboardi
- Jonathan Ullman
- Aaron Roth
- Anand D. Sarwate
In Computer Science Applications
- Anand D. Sarwate
- Gilles Barthe
- Kobbi Nissim
- Aaron Roth
- Marco Gaboardi
- Zhiwei Steven Wu
- Katrina Ligett
- Claire Monteleoni
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Aaron Roth
- Katrina Ligett
- Kamalika Chaudhuri
- Zhiwei Steven Wu
- Gilles Barthe
- Kobbi Nissim
- Marco Gaboardi
- Claire Monteleoni
Citations in the corpus
- Proving Differential Privacy via Probabilistic Couplings (2016, positive): “In this section, we provide a formal proof of the Exponential mechanism of McSherry and Talwar [27].”
- Differentially Private Empirical Risk Minimization (2009, positive): “In the notation of McSherry and Talwar (2007), the zmin = OPT , the base measure µ is uniform on [m], and St = {i : zi zmin + t}.”
- Knowledge-based Systems (2009, neutral): “8 Recall from Section 3.2 that this case considers 34 European countries, two values (religiosity (rl) and permissiveness (pr)), and two actions (divorce (dv) and parenthood by homosexual couples (ho)).”
- Adaptive Learning with Robust Generalization Guarantees (2016, positive): “The key results we use here are the upper bounds for private learning proven by [KLN + 11] using the exponential mechanism of [MT07], and the lower bounds for private proper threshold learning due to [BNSV15].”
- GUPT: privacy preserving data analysis made easy (2012, neutral): “PINQ (Privacy INtegrated Queries) proposed programming constructs which enable application developers to write differentially private programs using basic functional building blocks of differential privacy ( e.g. , exponential mechanism [17], noisy counts [5] etc.).”
- Plausible Deniability for Privacy-Preserving Data Synthesis (2017, neutral): “However, known mechanisms, such as the Laplacian mechanism [15] or the exponential mechanism [37], that achieve differential privacy through randomization, have practical limitations.”
- The Limits of Two-Party Differential Privacy (2010, neutral): “Given a deterministic protocol for computing the sensitivity1 function f(x, y) we construct an -differentially-private protocol by sampling messages of the new protocol using the exponential mechanism [29].”
- Differentially Private Online Learning (2011, neutral): “However, just for completeness, we note that by using techni ques similar to our Private OCP framework and using exponential mechanism(see [30]), one can analyze this algorithm as well to guarant ee differential privacy along with Õ( √ T ) regret.”
- A Program Logic for Union Bounds (2016, neutral): “Report-noisy-max is a variant of the exponential mechanism [32], which provides the standard way to achieve differential privacy for computations whose outputs lie in a finite (perhaps non-numeric) set R .”
- DJoin: Differentially Private Join Queries over Distributed Databases (2012, neutral): “, via the exponential mechanism [24], but we have not yet found a way to express them in terms of set intersections.”
- Optimal data-independent noise for differential privacy (2013, neutral): “Other methods for attaining ε -differential privacy not based on directly adding noise to the real query response are, for instance, the exponential mechanism [14], and the sample and aggregate framework [16].”