Clickthrough-based latent semantic models for web search
By Jianfeng Gao, Kristina Toutanova, Wen-tau Yih. 2011
98 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Information Retrieval & Search
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jianfeng Gao
- Li Deng
- Zhiyuan Liu
- Mohit Bansal
- Xiaodong He
- Jimmy J. Lin
- Wen-tau Yih
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
In Information Systems
In Information Retrieval & Search
Citations in the corpus
- Representation Learning Using Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks for Semantic Classification and Information Retrieval (2015, neutral): “402 PLSA(Topic=500) (Hofmann, 1999; Gao et al., 2011) 0.”
- Deep Learning: Methods and Applications (2014, methodology): “In the second line of research, click-through data, which consists of a list of queries and the corresponding clicked documents, is exploited for semantic modeling so as to bridge the language discrepancy between search queries and Web documents in recent studies [120, 124].”
- Learning Continuous Phrase Representations for Translation Modeling (2014, methodology): “, clickthrough data extracted from search logs) for query-document matching (Gao et al. 2011).”
- Multi-Task Retrieval for Knowledge-Intensive Tasks (2021, background): “…tokens explicitly and can potentially map para-phrases of completely different tokens to close vectors, performance of early dense retrieval methods was often inferior to term-matching approaches, except when large labelled data is available (Yih et al., 2011; Gao et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2013).”
- Situational Context for Ranking in Personal Search (2017, background): “There are a number of other approaches which use clickthrough data for web ranking (e.g., [17]).”
- Learning deep structured semantic models for web search using clickthrough data (2013, methodology): “[10] report that both BLTM and DPM outperform significantly the unsupervi sed latent semantic models, including LSA and PLSA, in the doc ument ranking task.”
- Applications of Topic Models (2017, methodology): “Loosely aligned models have been applied in information retrieval for query expansion [Gao et al., 2011, 2012]. While the topic models’ application in information retrieval (Chapter 2) focus on a single language, Gao et al. [2011] assume the queries and Web documents are in different “languages”.”
- How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence (2020, methodology): “In addition to these term matching methods, other researchers try to utilize meta-information (Medin, 2000; Gao et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2013) to capture semantic similarity.”
- A Dual Embedding Space Model for Document Ranking (2016, methodology): “ty of relevant documents near the query. ability to answer queries based on memorized clicks. There may even be insufficient behaviour data to learn a click-based embedding [18] or a translation model [10, 19]. In these cases it is crucial to model the relationship between the query and the document ”
- Learning Semantic Representations for the Phrase Translation Model (2013, methodology): “DPM (Row 8) is the Discriminative Projection Model described in [9].”
- A Latent Semantic Model with Convolutional-Pooling Structure for Information Retrieval (2014, methodology): “BLTM (Row 7) is the best performer among different versions of the bilingual topic models described in [15].”
- Incorporating Query Term Independence Assumption for Efficient Retrieval and Ranking using Deep Neural Networks (2019, methodology): “Some neural IR models [Huang et al., 2013, Gao et al., 2011] learn low dimensional dense vector representations of query and document that can be computed independently during inference.”
- Semantic Matching in Search (2014, background): “[71], which gives rise to the query-document pairs in click-through data, where documents are represented by their titles.”
- Learning Discriminative Projections for Text Similarity Measures (2011, background): “In a companion paper, we also demonstrated that various topic models including S2Net can enhance the ranking function (Gao et al., 2011).”