Intimacy dating goals and relationship satisfaction during adolescence and emerging adulthood: Identity formation, age and sex as moderators

By M. Zimmer‐Gembeck, J. E. Petherick. 2006

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83e5b4e022bcefd5bcd0eedcb0e078b3bc16f53e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Mark Helfand
2. Danielle M. Jackman
3. D. MacPhee
4. M. Zimmer‐Gembeck
5. Ellen A. Skinner
6. B. Compas
7. Rhiarne E. Pronk

Citations in the corpus

• Ten Years of Longitudinal Research on U.S. Adolescent Sexual Behavior: Developmental Correlates of Sexual Intercourse, and the Importance of Age, Gender and Ethnic Background. (2008, background): “…any of the hypotheses of Sexual Strategies Theory hold when relationship commitment and long-term mating may not be the main motivations for dating and sexual behavior among most adolescents (Brown, 1999; Connolly & Goldberg, 1999; Zimmer-Gembeck & Gallaty, 2006; Zimmer-Gembeck & Petherick, 2006)?”
• Self-Esteem and Future Orientation Predict Adolescents’ Risk Engagement (2017, background): “Identity development facilitates selfevaluation and positive psychological well-being (Crocetti, Rubini, Luyckx, & Meeus, 2008; Luyckx, Goossens, Soenens, Beyers, & Vansteenkiste, 2005) as well as social relationships (Zimmer-Gembeck & Petherick, 2006).”