Does It Matter Who Pays for Bond Ratings? Historical Evidence
By John (X.) Jiang, M. Stanford, Yuan Xie. 2010
307 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83dd122bae195294af8ebfa89aa278f79476c63a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Finance
Citations in the corpus
- Gender Differences in Financial Reporting Decision-Making: Evidence from Accounting Conservatism (2015, unknown): “Following Jiang, Stanford, and Xie (2012), we estimate the following demeaning regression model using the pooled sample: ∆CON = µ + β1Female + β2∆X + ɛ (2) where ∆CON is the difference between the mean value of conservatism for the post-transition period and the mean value of conservatism for the…”
- Have Rating Agencies Become More Conservative? Implications for Capital Structure and Debt Pricing (2013, background): “Finally, Jiang, Stanford, and Xie (2012) find that Standard and Poor’s assigned better ratings in 1974 after it switched from the investor-pay to the issuer-pay model.”
- Outsider Oversight: Designing a Third Party Audit Ecosystem for AI Governance (2022, background): “Similar dynamics have been found in credit rating agencies [39, 70], supply chain audits [142], and accounting audits [110].”