Efficiency and Stability of a Financial Architecture with Too-Interconnected-to-Fail Institutions

By Michael Gofman. 2017

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83d01ea8951ec7af0875c63095f2c4bb90d2b284

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Gangjin Wang
2. Chi Xie
3. H. Eugene Stanley
4. Zhi-Qiang Jiang
5. Ladislav Kristoufek
6. Ling-Yun He
7. Shu-Peng Chen
8. Guangxi Cao

In Finance

1. Chi Xie
2. Gangjin Wang
3. H. Eugene Stanley
4. Zhi-Qiang Jiang
5. Ladislav Kristoufek

Citations in the corpus

• Systemic Risk in Financial Networks: A Survey (2020, unknown): “This is a point studied in detail by Elliott, Golub & Jackson (2014), and it applies to a variety of models including Cifuentes, Ferrucci & Shin (2005); Gai & Kapadia (2010); Wagner (2010); Elliott, Golub & Jackson (2014); Gofman (2017); Jackson & Pernoud (2019).”
• Interconnectedness and systemic risk of China's financial institutions (2017, background): “Thus academics have proposed that a financial institution can be “too interconnected to fail” (Markose et al., 2012; Gofman, 2017), and the Financial Stability Board (FSB) established after the 2009 * Corresponding authors at: Business School of Hunan University, 11 Lushan South Road, Yuelu…”