Money Talks: The Environmental Impact of China's Green Credit Policy
By Junxiu Sun, Feng Wang, Haitao Yin, Bing Zhang. Journal of policy analysis and management, 2019
185 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This study examines the impact of China's green credit policy on the environment. In particular, we consider an initiative that requires all banks to base their loan decisions on corporate environmental performance. This is an important issue since it is globally gaining popularity to leverage bank loans as an avenue to enforce corporate environmental responsibility. Moreover, there are only a handful of empirical investigations in relation to the impacts of credit constraint on corporate environmental behaviors and strategies. This research also provides useful insights on how to enhance environmental regulation enforcement, using the Environmental Protection Bureau in partnership with local banks to exert a creditable threat of financial constraint on unfavorable environmental outcomes. Using the synthetic control method and difference‐in‐differences analysis, we find that this policy has significantly motivated firms, particularly those firms with a higher dependence on external financing, to reduce water pollution. We further discover that the policy compels firms to favor pollution prevention at the source instead of end‐of‐pipe treatments, since the policy imposes a long‐term credit constraint on pollution.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83ce1a55e2ea6bf09345e76fd0a3aa456c7d753b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
Citations in the corpus
- Green credit policy and firm performance: What we learn from China (2021, background): “Some studies pointed out that green credit helps to effectively curb the investment level and long-term borrowing level of energy-intensive industries and highly polluting firms (Liu et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2019).”