Microsatellite markers in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] derived from an enriched genomic and cDNA libraries

By T. Yamamoto, K. Mochida, T. Imai, Y. Shi, I. Ogiwara, T. Hayashi. 2002

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Construction of an intra-specific sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) genetic linkage map and synteny analysis with the Prunus reference map (2008, unknown): “M P. persica cDNA 9 8 0 0 (0) Yamamoto et al. 2002 MA P. persica cDNA 44 35 16 12 (27) Yamamoto et al. 2002 MD P. persica cDNA 5 4 1 1 (20) Yamamoto et al. 2005 PacC25 P. armeniaca cDNA 1 1 0 0 (0) Decroocq et al. 2003 PaCITA P. armeniaca Genomic 6 6 0 0 (0) Lopes et al. 2002 Pce P. cerasus Genomi”
Development of a second-generation genetic linkage map for peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] and characterization of morphological traits affecting flower and fruit (2006, methodology): “UDP Genomic library Cipriani et al. 1999; Testolin et al. 2000 26 25 8 Pchgms Sosinski et al. 2000 8 8 0 CPPCT Aranzana et al. 2002 35 34 9 BPPCT Dirlewanger et al. 2002 41 41 13 MA Yamamoto et al. 2002 28 28 7 SSRGDR GDR database (http://www.genome.clemson. edu) 6 6 2 Total 144 142 (98.6”
Fruit size QTL analysis of an F1 population derived from a cross between a domesticated sweet cherry cultivar and a wild forest sweet cherry (2009, background): “These investigations include sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.; Wang et al. 2000), peach (Yamamoto et al. 2002; Dirlewanger et al. 2002; Etienne et al. 2002; Quilot et al. 2004), and apple (King et al. 2001; Liebhard et al. 2003; Kenis et al. 2008).”