In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose.

By G. Helenius, H. Bäckdahl, A. Bodin, U. Nannmark, P. Gatenholm, B. Risberg. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A, 2006

675 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect (2014, background): “11 the host tissue, did not elicit any chronic inflammatory reactions [30].”
Recent advances in bacterial cellulose (2014, background): “(3) Naked BC tubes are biocompatible, and show good blood compatibility when tested in vitro and in vivo (Esguerra et al. 2010; Fink et al. 2010; Helenius et al. 2006).”
The influence of fermentation conditions and post-treatment methods on porosity of bacterial cellulose membrane (2009, background): “Helenius and coworkers implanted bacterial cellulose subcutaneously in rats for 1, 4, and 12 weeks, respectively, and found that the biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose was good and the material had potential to be used as a scaffold in tissue engineering ( Helenius et al. 2006 ).”
A review of tissue-engineered skin bioconstructs available for skin reconstruction (2010, background): “2007), bacterial cellulose (Helenius et al. 2006), ICX-SKN skin graft replacement (Boyd et al.”
Bacterial cellulose/poly(ethylene glycol) composite: characterization and first evaluation of biocompatibility (2010, background): “The potential of BC scaffold for in vitro and in vivo tissue regeneration also continues to be explored and shows great promise (Watanabe et al. 1993; Svensson et al. 2005; Helenius et al. 2006; Backdahl et al. 2006).”