The Nature of Consciousness: A Hypothesis
By Susan Pockett. 2000
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/839a26e199191d53b548bdbd20651fb6300bb228
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Consciousness as a phenomenon in the operational architectonics of brain organization: Criticality and self-organization considerations (2013, background): “This approach is currently supported by most researchers working in the field [12-24] and is distinct from alternative ideas according to which consciousness is either a supernatural phenomenon that is entirely beyond the reach of science [25-28], or is a phenomenon found at the quantum level [29-32”
- Cosmopsychism: A Holistic Approach to the Metaphysics of Experience (2015, background): “18 Other relatively recent sources worth mentioning in this respect are Pockett (2000) and Sprigge (2006).”
- PHENOMENOLOGICAL ARCHITECTURE OF A MIND AND OPERATIONAL ARCHITECTONICS OF THE BRAIN: THE UNIFIED METASTABLE CONTINUUM (2009, unknown): “There are several theoretical frameworks that try to integrate brain and mind.(17,31,32,34,37-46) However, practically all of them do not take phenomenal consciousness of mind seriously and in the best case they try to explain consciousness through its neural correlates,(47-49) despite the fact that”
- Synchronous firing and its influence on the brain's electromagnetic field: Evidence for an electromagnetic field theory of consciousness (2002, background): “I have earlier proposed (McFadden, 2000) that the seat of consciousness is the brain's em field and a similar proposal has recently been put forward by Susan Pockett (2000).”