Neighborhood Effects of Concentrated Mortgage Foreclosures

320 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Foreclosure externalities: New evidence (2015, methodology): “For example, Campbell, Giglio, and Pathak (2011) uses data from the state of Massachusetts, Immergluck and Smith (2006) uses data from Chicago, and Schuetz, Been, and Ellen (2008) uses data from New York City.”
The Impact of Abandoned Properties on Nearby Property Values (2014, methodology): “Most prior studies (Immergluck & Smith, 2006a; Lin et al., 2009; Rogers, 2010; Schuetz et al., 2008; Shlay &Whitman, 2006) estimated the impact of foreclosures on the sales prices of nearby properties using cross-sectional hedonic price models.”
Do foreclosures cause crime (2013, unknown): “Active Foreclosures (eventually going to auction)”
Deconstructing distressed-property spillovers: The effects of vacant, tax-delinquent, and foreclosed properties in housing submarkets (2013, background): “Most of the results clustered around a one percent lower sale price for each nearby foreclosures (Immergluck and Smith, 2006; Schuetz et al., 2008; Harding et al., 2009; Rogers and Winter, 2009; Rogers, 2010; Campbell et al., 2011; Groves and Rogers, 2011).”
Second Chances: Subprime Mortgage Modification and Re-Default (2009, background): “1 See Schuetz et al.(2008) and Campbell et al (2009).”