The potential conservation value of unmowed powerline strips for native bees

By K. Russell, Harold Ikerd, S. Droege. 2005

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8390df7b5cd0fa576f015a9ed25a060b5c22bf00

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Julianna K. Tuell
2. R. Isaacs
3. D. Larkin
4. Rebecca K. Tonietto
5. B. Blaauw

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. R. Isaacs
2. D. Larkin
3. Rebecca K. Tonietto

In Plant Science

1. R. Isaacs
2. B. Blaauw

Citations in the corpus

• Habitat restoration benefits wild bees: A meta‐analysis (2018, background): “Two individual studies found negative effects on bee richness; Russell, Ikerd, and Droege (2005) reported a negative effect of continuous mowing of powerline strips relative to unmown controls, and Potts et al. (2006) found fewer species of bees in pine forests that had been burned for 10 or more…”
• Elevated pan traps to monitor bees in flowering crop canopies (2009, background): “The use of pan traps to monitor bee communities is a relatively recent development, but it is increasingly used as a sampling tool by researchers in urban, pastoral, and natural landscapes (Leong & Thorp, 1999; McIntyre & Hostetler, 2001; Williams et al., 2001; Russell et al., 2005; Toler et al., 20”