Process-based modelling of invertebrate drift transport, net energy intake and reach carrying capacity for drift-feeding salmonids

By J. Hayes, N. F. Hughes, L. H. Kelly. 2007

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/836fddc93064f6efb748938f8c6fdb0e9ff11f76

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Richardson
2. C. Leigh
3. J. Rosenfeld
4. S. Naman
5. F. Sheldon
6. R. Rolls
7. Michel Loreau
8. Andrew Gonzalez

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Richardson
2. C. Leigh
3. J. Rosenfeld
4. S. Naman
5. F. Sheldon
6. R. Rolls
7. Michel Loreau
8. Andrew Gonzalez

In Water Science and Technology

1. C. Leigh
2. J. Richardson
3. J. Rosenfeld
4. S. Naman
5. F. Sheldon
6. R. Rolls

Citations in the corpus

• Mechanistic effects of low-flow hydrology on riverine ecosystems: ecological principles and consequences of alteration (2012, background): “Under low flows, net energy intake by drift-feeding fish declines as a consequence of reduced densities of drifting prey (Closs 1994, Hayes et al. 2007).”
• Causes and consequences of invertebrate drift in running waters: from individuals to populations and trophic fluxes (2016, methodology): “While it is known that predation may have localized effects on drift concentration (i.e., causes depletion immediately downstream of a fishes focal point; Hughes 1992; Hayes et al. 2007), an implicit assumptionofmostdrift-foragingmodels is that there are no active feedbacks from predation on driftin”