Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects
By Jeffrey R. Kling, Jeffrey B. Liebman, Lawrence F. Katz. 2005
544 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Health, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/836fd7020ae2b34789250770a071ea8dee1f7fa2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Votes and Violence: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria (2014, unknown): “21 As in Kling et al. (2007), if an individual has a valid response to at least one component measure of an index, then we impute any missing values for other component measures at the random assignment group mean for the corresponding time period.”
- What are We Learning from Business Training and Entrepreneurship Evaluations Around the Developing World? (2012, unknown): “For example, de Mel et al. (2012) find that training (and grants) leads to changes in the characteristics of who opens businesses, even though the rates of ownership do not differ in the treatment and control groups.”
- The Economic Returns to Social Interaction: Experimental Evidence from Microfinance (2013, unknown): “By construction, the index has a mean of 0 for the Control group (for further details, see Kling et al., 2007).”
- Mechanism Experiments and Policy Evaluations (2011, unknown): “…traditional voucher treatment did not have many detectable impacts on the outcomes of Moving to Opportunity parents or children 4–7 years after baseline (Kling, Ludwig, and Katz, 2005; Sanbonmatsu, Kling, Duncan, and Brooks-Gunn, 2006; Kling, Liebman, and Katz, 2007; Fortson and Sanbonmatsu, 2010).”
- Can Informed Public Deliberation Overcome Clientelism? Experimental Evidence from Benin (2013, unknown): “When candidates endorse treatment in areas in which they are “dominant,” it has a 2 Given our multiple measures of clientelism-related practices, we use a procedure for multiple outcome testing suggested by Kling, Liebman, and Katz (2007) to test the overall effect on the family of variables.”
- Site Selection Bias in Program Evaluation (2015, unknown): “For example, the Moving to Opportunity and RAND Health Insurance experiments were implemented in multiple cities chosen for diversity in size and geographic region (Kling, Liebman, and Katz 2007, Manning et al. 1988).”
- Multiple Inference and Gender Differences in the Effects of Early Intervention: A Reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects (2008, unknown): “Kling, Liebman, and Katz (2007) reported that the Moving to Opportunity program improves educational outcomes and mental health for females but appears to have negative effects on male participants.”
- Social Networks and the Decision to Insure (2015, unknown): “2 Experimental approaches were used by Duflo and Saez (2003), Dupas (2010), Kling et al. (2007), and Oster and Thornton (Forthcoming), etc. Non-experimental methods were used notably by Arcidiacono and Nicholson (2005), Bandiera and Rasul (2006), Bertrand et al. (2000), Conley and Udry (2010),…”