Rapid trial-and-error learning with simulation supports flexible tool use and physical reasoning

By Kelsey R. Allen, Kevin A. Smith, Josh Tenenbaum. 2019

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Many animals, and an increasing number of artificial agents, display sophisticated capabilities to perceive and manipulate objects. But human beings remain distinctive in their capacity for flexible, creative tool use—using objects in new ways to act on the world, achieve a goal, or solve a problem. To study this type of general physical problem solving, we introduce the Virtual Tools game. In this game, people solve a large range of challenging physical puzzles in just a handful of attempts. We propose that the flexibility of human physical problem solving rests on an ability to imagine the effects of hypothesized actions, while the efficiency of human search arises from rich action priors which are updated via observations of the world. We instantiate these components in the “sample, simulate, update” (SSUP) model and show that it captures human performance across 30 levels of the Virtual Tools game. More broadly, this model provides a mechanism for explaining how people condense general physical knowledge into actionable, task-specific plans to achieve flexible and efficient physical problem solving.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Joelle Pineau
  2. Josh Tenenbaum
  3. Sergey Levine
  4. Li Fei-Fei
  5. Yoshua Bengio
  6. Mohit Bansal
  7. Amy Zhang
  8. Ruslan Salakhutdinov

In Control and Systems Engineering

  1. Joelle Pineau
  2. Josh Tenenbaum
  3. Amy Zhang
  4. Daniel L. K. Yamins
  5. Damian Mrowca
  6. Shagun Sodhani
  7. Kevin A. Smith
  8. Li Fei-Fei

Citations in the corpus