The Neuroanatomy of Autobiographical Memory: A Slow Cortical Potential Study of Autobiographical Memory Retrieval ☆

By M. Conway, Christopher W. Pleydell-Pearce, Se Whitecross. 2001

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/835e265bf2a5148dbfe3a7282ac1d0f5b969582f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The restless engram: consolidations never end. (2012, background): “How can we gain insights into a process as complex as memory retrieval when fMRI gives us only snapshots of brain states averaged over a period of time that is much longer than that in which the machinery of retrieval functions? Previous studies using noninvasive scalp EEG have yielded some data on ”
Remembering the past and imagining the future: common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration. (2007, methodology): “These findings are contrary to electrophysiological data from Conway and colleagues (Conway et al., 2001;Conway et al., 2003) demonstrating that the reconstruction phase of past event retrieval is dominated by strong left prefrontal activity and that widespread posterior cortical activity is not evi”
Characterizing spatial and temporal features of autobiographical memory retrieval networks: a partial least squares approach (2004, methodology): “Further, this result is in line with findings from two slow cortical potential studies of specific AM retrieval (Conway et al., 2001, 2003), which reported that specific AMs were associated with activity later in the retrieval phase.”
The molecular and systems biology of memory. (2014, unknown): “Previous studies using noninvasive scalp EEG have yielded some data on temporal phases of retrieval (Conway et al., 2001; Rugg et al., 2002), but the low spatial resolution of this technology presents a serious obstacle.”