Crowdfunding: A Literature Review and Research Directions

By Alexandra Moritz, J. Block. 2014

258 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8357cc73005876efc6fef427ee9cbb2bbdd8c0a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. F. Polzin
2. Wanxiang Cai
3. Helen S. Toxopeus
4. E. Stam
5. Rotem Shneor
6. A. Vik
7. E. Malecki
8. Andrew H. Van de Ven

In Information Systems

1. E. Stam
2. Rotem Shneor
3. A. Vik

In Management Information Systems

1. F. Polzin
2. Wanxiang Cai
3. Helen S. Toxopeus
4. E. Stam
5. Rotem Shneor
6. A. Vik

Citations in the corpus

• Which updates during an equity crowdfunding campaign increase crowd participation? (2016, unknown): “In addition, our paper contributes to the small but growing literature on the effects of information disclosure on equity crowdfunding participation (Vismara 2016b; Ahlers et al. 2015; Moritz et al. 2015; Moritz and Block 2015; Bernstein et al. 2017).”
• Is the crowd sensitive to distance?—how investment decisions differ by investor type (2017, unknown): “See also, e.g., Colombo et al. (2014), Mollick (2014), and Moritz and Block (2016) for comprehensive reviews of current crowdfunding literature.”
• Crowdfunding success: a systematic literature review 2010–2017 (2020, background): “At a market level, CF is also seen as a way for reducing chronic funding gaps in early stage venturing, which worsened following recent financial crises (Moritz and Block, 2016).”
• The wisdom of the crowd in funding: information heterogeneity and social networks of crowdfunders (2018, background): “A growing interest and body of research is emerging into this new form of entrepreneurial finance (for reviews see Kuppuswamy & Bayus 2015; Moritz & Block 2016).”
• Equity retention and social network theory in equity crowdfunding (2016, unknown): “Due to the novelty of the phenomenon, signaling mechanisms have been studied less thoroughly in the setting of crowdfunding than in traditional entrepreneurial finance (for a review, see Moritz and Block, 2015).”
• Crowdfunding and social capital: A systematic review using a dynamic perspective (2021, background): “1 The academic attention to crowdfunding has been growing in lockstep with the phenomenon ’ s development, resulting in several literature reviews (Martínez-Climent et al., 2018; Mochkabadi and Volkmann, 2018; Moritz and Block, 2016).”