Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Lyα forest and galaxy bias: Constraints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neutrino mass, and dark energy

By Uros Seljak, A. Makarov, P. Mcdonald, S. Anderson, N. Bahcall, J. Brinkmann, S. Burles, Renyue Cen, M. Doi, J. Gunn and 13 more. 2004

903 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We combine the constraints from the recent Lyα forest analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and the SDSS galaxy bias analysis with previous constraints from SDSS galaxy clustering, the latest supernovae, and 1st year WMAP cosmic microwave background anisotropies. We find significant improvements on all of the cosmological parameters compared to previous constraints, which highlights the importance of combining Lyα forest constraints with other probes. combining WMAP and the Lyα forest we find for the primordial slope ns = 0:98±0:02. We see no evidence of running, dn/=d lnk 0:003±0:010, a factor of 3 improvement over previous constraints. We also find no evidence of tensors, r < 0:36 (95% c.l.). Inflationary models predict the absence of running and many among them satisfy these constraints, particularly negative curvature models such as those based on spontaneous symmetry breaking. A positive correlation between tensors and primordial slope disfavors chaotic inflation-type models with steep slopes: while the V αo 2 model is within the 2-sigma contour, V αo4 is outside the 3- sigma contour. For the amplitude we find σ8 = 0:90 ± 0:03 from the Lyα forest and WMAP alone. We find no evidence of neutrino mass: for the case of 3 massive neutrino families with an inflationary prior, Σmv < 0:42 eV and the mass of lightest neutrino is m1 < 0:13 eV at 95% c.l. For the 3 massless +1 massive neutrino case we find mv < 0:79 eV for the massive neutrino, excluding at 95% c.l. all neutrino mass solutions compatible with the LSND results. We explore dark energy constraints in models with a fairly general time dependence of dark energy equation of state, finding Ωλ =0:72± 0:02, w(z = 0:3) = 0:98+0.10 -0.12,the latter changing to w(z = 0:3) = -0.92+0.09-0.10 if tensors are allowed. We find no evidence for variation of the equation of state with redshift, w(z = 1) = -1.03+0.21-0.28. These results rely on the current understanding of the Lyα forest and other probes, which need to be explored further both observationally and theoretically, but extensive tests reveal no evidence of inconsistency among different data sets used here.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83508ad85a20c1f968fc24e80de535a5937830b7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Citations in the corpus

Towards inflation in string theory (2003, neutral): “Finally, recent observational data imply [22] that”
A primer on hierarchical galaxy formation: the semi-analytical approach (2006, background): “…spectrum data, the constraints on cosmological parameters can be tightened, through the breaking of certain degeneracies (Efstathiou et al. 2002; Percival et al. 2002; Spergel et al. 2003; Tegmark et al. 2004b; Seljak et al. 2005; MacTavish et al. 2006; Sanchez et al. 2006; Spergel et al. 2006).”
The Search for Heavy Majorana Neutrinos (2009, background): “5) For the light Majorana neutrinos, namely, m = 1, 2, 3 the masses mνm ∼ O(eV) [111] and for the heavy Majorana neutrinos , the masses mNm′ ∼ O(MeV − GeV) for the low energy processes we consider.”
Halo assembly bias and its effects on galaxy clustering (2006, methodology): “…are = 0.75, m = 1 http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/∼swhite/talk/NNG05.pdf dm + b = 0.25, b = 0.045, h = 0.73 and σ 8 = 0.9, consistent with a combined analysis of the 2dFGRS (Colless et al. 2001) and first-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe data (Spergel et al. 2003; Seljak et al. 2005).”
Wouthuysen-Field coupling strength and application to high-redshift 21-cm radiation (2005, methodology): “6.9 In both cases, the best-fit 6-parameter cosmology of Seljak et al. (2005) was used.”
Observational Constraints on Cosmic Reionization (2006, background): “WMAP’s first-year results are relatively robust to the choice of additional data sets and priors used to constrain cosmological parameters (including τ), such as SDSS ((Tegmark et al.(2004))) and Lyα forest measurements (Seljak et al.(2005)).”