Evidence-based quality improvement: the state of the science.

By K. Shojania, Jeremy M. Grimshaw. Health Affairs, 2005

642 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/834b782d55be877e55734afd518d32d1101df617

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

Citations in the corpus

How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types (2015, background): “64 65 Their drawback is that they do not account for secular trends that might be occurring at the same time, 66 something that remains an important problem determining whether a particular intervention or programme has genuinely produced improvement over change that was occurring anyway.”
Toward an Evidence-Based System for Innovation Support for Implementing Innovations with Quality: Tools, Training, Technical Assistance, and Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement (2012, background): “Evidence is needed for how innovations can be adopted and used in ways that improve quality and advance out- comes in practice settings (Shojania and Grimshaw 2005).”
An Overview of Research and Evaluation Designs for Dissemination and Implementation (2017, background): “Others are less sanguine about randomized designs in this context and suggest nonrandomized alternatives (71, 102).”
Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis. (2006, background): “Lack of detail about intervention features represents a frequently encountered problem for systematic reviews of QI strategies.(30,103) As more guidelines for QI research appear,(104) published evaluations will hopefully provide more complete descriptions of interventions and do so using established”
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process (2015, neutral): “drafts, and (3) pilot testing with authors and a public”