Material flows and economic models: an analytical comparison of SFA, LCA and partial equilibrium models

By M. Bouman, Reinout Heijungs, E. Voet, J. Bergh, Gjalt Huppes. 2000

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8338488b5500c5773c4304dbba7f12d58808964e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

1. R. Hoekstra
2. J. C. van den Bergh
3. Kerui Du
4. Xiaoling Ouyang
5. Chunping Xie
6. Richard Wood
7. Ming Xu

Citations in the corpus

• Research, part of a Special Feature on A Framework for Analyzing, Comparing, and Diagnosing Social-Ecological Systems Comparison of Frameworks for Analyzing Social-ecological Systems (2013, unknown): “These approaches include: l combining material or energy flows and economic flows (Duchin and Steenge 1999, Bouman et al. 2000, Kytzia et al. 2004; for a review see Binder 2007); l modeling human behavior and drivers that specifically impact on an ecosystem or an ecosystem service (Redman 1999,…”
• Structural Decomposition Analysis of Physical Flows in the Economy (2002, methodology): “For an overview of LCA, MFA, MPCA and related methods see Kandelaars (1998); and for a comparison of methods see Bouman et al. (2000).”
• The invisible wand: adaptive co-management as an emergent strategy in complex bio-economic system (2001, methodology): “Bouman et al. (2000) take this approach to compare models of substance flow analysis, life-cycle assessment and partial equilibrium analysis.”