Capital Requirements, Market Power and Risk-Taking in Banking
By Rafael Repullo. 2004
973 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8335489a09ca96759d2e9304905605db609abe53
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Thorsten Beck
- F. González
- Allen N. Berger
- Elena Carletti
- Amine Tarazi
- Luc Laeven
- Phil Molyneux
- Laurent Weill
In Economics and Econometrics
- Thorsten Beck
- Allen N. Berger
- Elena Carletti
- Luc Laeven
- F. González
- Franklin Allen
- Anjan V. Thakor
- Stijn Claessens
In Finance
- Thorsten Beck
- Allen N. Berger
- Elena Carletti
- F. González
- Luc Laeven
- Phil Molyneux
- Stijn Claessens
- Asli Demirgüç-Kunt
Citations in the corpus
- Bank Risk Taking and Liquidity Creation Following Regulatory Interventions and Capital Support (2011, positive): “…and Santomero (1998); Allen and Gale (2004)), and that higher capital improves banks’ ability to absorb risk (e.g., Bhattacharya and Thakor (1993); Repullo (2004); von Thadden (2004); Coval and Thakor (2005)), so higher capital ratios may allow banks to create more liquidity.10 The ‘financial…”
- Banking Competition and Capital Ratios (2007, neutral): “For example, Smith (1984), Hellman et al. (2000), and Repullo (2004) suggest that increased competition decreases banks’ soundness.”
- Benefits and Costs of Bank Capital (2016, background): “Capital can limit these excesses by increasing shareholders’ “skin in the game”: the amount of equity at risk in the event of bank failure (Myers and Majluf 1984; Marcus 1984; Keeley 1990; Esty 1998; Matutes and Vives 2000; Hellmann, Murdock, and Stiglitz 2000; Repullo 2004).”
- Bank Capital, Liquidity Creation and Deposit Insurance (2016, positive): “As argued under the “risk absorption” hypothesis (e.g. Bhattacharya and Thakor 1993, Repullo 2004, Von Thadden 2004, Coval and Thakor 2005), it is important to appropriately control for bank risk as the main reason for banks to hold capital is to be able to absorb risk.”
- Financial liberalization and bank risk-taking: International evidence (2014, background): “A set of theoretical literature models the link between financial liberalization and bank risk through increases in bank competition following the traditional “competition-fragility” view (Hellman et al., 2000; Repullo, 2004).”
- CHAPTER 14 – Competition and Regulation in Banking (2008, background): “A different result on the effectiveness of capital regulation is obtained by Repullo (2004)”
- Bank regulatory capital and liquidity: Evidence from US and European publicly traded banks (2013, background): “Under the second view, higher capital enhances the ability of banks to create liquidity because it allows them to absorb greater risk (Bhattacharya and Thakor, 1993; Repullo, 2004; Von Thadden 2004).”
- The Risk Sensitivity of Capital Requirements: Evidence from an International Sample of Large Banks* (2013, background): “Repullo (2004) looks at the role of competition and Peura and Keppo (2006) and Flannery and Rangan (2008) at market discipline in affecting the effect of capital rules on bank risk-taking. bank assets.”