Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular…

By F. Grothues, Gillian Smith, J. Moon, N. Bellenger, P. Collins, H. Klein, D. Pennell. American Journal of Cardiology, 2002

1,470 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83324783f1b8027d585fb9d0d8f5dc6c5bb8cac9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

1. L. Badano
2. T. Marwick
3. Daniel Rueckert
4. P. Lancellotti
5. T. Force

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

1. Bernhard Kainz
2. Ben Glocker
3. Daniel Rueckert
4. T. Marwick
5. Paul M. Matthews
6. Wenjia Bai
7. Giacomo Tarroni
8. Arvid Lundervold

Citations in the corpus

• Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. (2014, methodology): “Measurements of LVEF and volumes by CMR have been shown to be highly accurate and reproducible(218) and have been demonstrated to be more reproducible than LV volumes and mass by echocardiography.(111,219,220) Therefore, one obvious advantage of using CMR is in clinical research studies using LV vol”
• Normal human left and right ventricular and left atrial dimensions using steady state free precession magnetic resonance imaging. (2005, methodology): “It is an accurate and reliable technique for the serial monitoring of patients, particularly in response to therapeutic intervention (2).”
• Normalized left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. (2006, background): “The excellent accuracy and reproducibility of CMR is well established (2), making it a gold standard technique which can be very cost effective (3).”
• Automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance image analysis with fully convolutional networks (2017, methodology): “ls belonging to the corresponding label class in the segmentation, multiplied by the volume per voxel. The LV mass was calculated by multiplying the LV myocardial volume with the density of 1.05 g/mL [25]. Evaluation of human performance For quantitative evaluation of human performance, we assessed ”
• Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. (2014, methodology): “Measurements of LVEF and volumes by CMR have been shown to be highly accurate and reproducible(218) and have been demonstrated to be more reproducible than LV volumes and mass byechocardiography.(111,219,220) Therefore, one obvious advantage of using CMR is in clinical research studies using LV volu”