Taming big probability distributions
By Ronitt Rubinfeld. 2012
103 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Jayadev Acharya
- Clément Louis Canonne
- Himanshu Tyagi
- Ziteng Sun
- Sivaraman Balakrishnan
- Ilias Diakonikolas
- Larry A. Wasserman
- Yanjun Han
Citations in the corpus
- Inference Under Information Constraints I: Lower Bounds From Chi-Square Contraction (2018, methodology): “We refer the reader to surveys [7], [15], [18], [43] for a comprehensive review of recent results on discrete distribution learning and testing.”
- Distributed Simulation and Distributed Inference (2018, methodology): “We point out that the above formulation encompasses both density and parameter estimation, as well as distribution testing (see e.g. [Rub12, Can15] and [Gol17] for a survey of property and distribution testing).”
- Inference Under Information Constraints II: Communication Constraints and Shared Randomness (2019, background): “setting of interest to us has received a lot of attention in the past decade, especially in the computer science literature; see [8], [17], [41] for surveys.”
- Communication Complexity of Statistical Distance (2018, background): “(For results about the complexity of other problems where the inputs are black-box samples from distributions, see the surveys [8, 15, 25].)”
- Inference Under Information Constraints III: Local Privacy Constraints (2021, background): “In this section, we only focus on closely related papers and we refer an interested reader to surveys and books [13], [21], [34], [43] for a comprehensive treatment.”
- Differentially Private Identity and Closeness Testing of Discrete Distributions (2017, background): “…sample complexity of our private closeness tester is Related Work During the past two decades, distribution property testing [3] – whose roots lie in statistical hypothesis testing [23, 22] – has received considerable attention by the computer science community, see [25, 7] for two recent surveys.”
- Distribution Testing Lower Bounds via Reductions from Communication Complexity (2019, background): “Tight upper and lower bounds on the sample complexity have been obtained for properties such as uniformity, identity to a specified distribution, monotonicity, and many more (see references above, or [46, 18] for surveys).”
- Communication and Memory Efficient Testing of Discrete Distributions (2019, background): “The field of distribution property testing Batu et al. (2000) has been extensively investigated in the past couple of decades, see, e.g., the surveys Rubinfeld (2012); Canonne (2015); Goldreich (2017).”
- An Automatic Inequality Prover and Instance Optimal Identity Testing (2014, unknown): “Also see [15] for a recent survey.”
- Testing Identity of Structured Distributions (2014, background): “ptotically fewer than the support size n, and ideally much less than that. See [GR00, BFR+00, BFF+01, Bat01, BDKR02, BKR04, Pan08, Val11, VV11, DDS+13, ADJ+11, LRR11, ILR12] for a sample of works and [Rub12] for a survey. One of the first problems studied in this line of work is that of “identity tes”
- Hypothesis Testing for High-Dimensional Multinomials: A Selective Review (2017, methodology): “…theory and theoretical computer science and we provide an overview of some important results from these different communities in this paper.2 2Theoretical computer science centric surveys of a subset of these results include the papers Rubinfeld (2012), Goldreich (2017) and Canonne (2018).”
- Differentially Private Identity and Equivalence Testing of Discrete Distributions (2018, background): “…two decades, distribution property testing (Batu et al., 2000) – whose roots lie in statistical hypothesis testing (Neyman & Pearson, 1933; Lehmann & Romano, 2005) – has received considerable attention by the computer science community, see (Rubinfeld, 2012; Canonne, 2015) for two recent surveys.”
- Domain Compression and its Application to Randomness-Optimal Distributed Goodness-of-Fit (2019, methodology): “…line of work culminated in efficient and sample-optimal testing algorithms [Pan08, VV17, ADK15, Gol16, DGPP18]; we refer the reader to the surveys [Rub12, Can15, BW18], as well as the recent book [Gol17] (Chapter 11) for further details on identity testing, and the more general field of…”
- Optimal Algorithms for Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributions (2013, background): “Estimating properties of distributions using samples is a classical topic in statistics that has received considerable attention in the theoretical CS community during the past decade; see [GR00, BFR00, BFF01, Bat01, BDKR02, BKR04, Pan08, Val08, Ona09, Val11, VV11a, VV11b, DDS13, Rub12, BNNR11, ADJ1”