The brain as a flexible task machine: implications for visual rehabilitation using noninvasive vs. invasive approaches.

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Multisensory Processes: A Balancing Act across the Lifespan (2016, background): “This spans many types of rehabilitation, including for patients with stroke [65] or sensory loss [66] (see next section) and in adaptation to new prosthetic devices like bionic eyes, cochlear implants, and prosthetic limbs, as these devices become increasingly widespread in modern clinical practice ”
Reading with sounds: sensory substitution selectively activates the visual word form area in the blind. (2012, background): “, 2012b) supportive synchronous input to the visual signal arriving from an external invasive device (Reich et al., 2012; Striem-Amit et al., 2011).”
Multisensory integration: flexible use of general operations (2014, unknown): “An interesting view from sensory substitution research is that cortical functional specialization may actually be more driven by task goals than by the modality of sensory experience (Reich et al., 2012).”
Functional connectivity of visual cortex in the blind follows retinotopic organization principles (2015, background): “…modalities (Pietrini et al., 2004; Mahon et al., 2009; Ptito et al., 2009; Renier et al., 2010; Collignon et al., 2011, 2013; Bedny and Saxe, 2012; Reich et al., 2012; Striem-Amit et al., 2012a, b; Arnott et al., 2013; He et al., 2013; Kitada et al., 2013; Peelen et al., 2014; Striem-Amit and…”