Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z1071 Clinical Trial
By J. Boughey, V. Suman, E. Mittendorf, G. Ahrendt, L. Wilke, B. Taback, A. Leitch, H. Kuerer, Monet W. Bowling, T. Flippo-Morton and 11 more. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2013
1,475 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Importance Sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery provides reliable nodal staging information with less morbidity than axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for clinically node-negative (cN0) breast cancer patients. The application of SLN surgery for staging the axilla following chemotherapy for women who initially had node-positive breast cancer (cN1) is unclear because of high false negative results reported in previous studies. Objective To determine the false negative rate (FNR) for SLN surgery following chemotherapy in patients initially presenting with biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Patients The ACOSOG Z1071 trial enrolled women with clinical T0–4 N1–2, M0 breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Following chemotherapy, patients underwent both SLN surgery and ALND. SLN surgery using both blue dye and a radiolabeled colloid mapping agent was encouraged. Main Outcome Measure The primary endpoint was the FNR of SLN surgery after chemotherapy in women who presented with cN1 disease. We examined the likelihood that the FNR in those with 2 or more SLNs examined was greater than 10%, the rate expected for women undergoing SLN surgery who present with clinically node-negative disease. Results Seven hundred fifty-six patients were enrolled from 136 institutions. Of 663 evaluable patients with cN1 disease, 649 underwent chemotherapy followed by both SLN surgery and ALND. A SLN could not be identified in 46 patients (7.1%). Only one SLN was excised in 78 patients (12.0%). Of the remaining 525 patients with 2 or more SLNs removed, no cancer was identified in the axillary lymph nodes of 215 patients yielding a pathological complete nodal response of 41.0% (95% CI: 36.7%–45.3%). In 39 patients, cancer was not identified in the SLNs but was found in lymph nodes obtained with ALND resulting in a FNR of 12.6% (90% Bayesian Credible Interval, 9.85%–16.05%). Conclusions and Relevance Among women with cN1 breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy who had 2 or more SLNs examined, the FNR was not found to be 10% or less. Given this FNR threshold, changes in approach and patient selection that result in greater sensitivity would be necessary to support the use of SLN surgery as an alternative to ALND. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov; trial identifier NCT00881361.
Subfields: Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/830b142c55f2e828f790dd87c18159c6ad71a368
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- E. Senkus
- J. Boileau
- S. Kyriakides
- F. Penault-Llorca
- G. Lyman
- S. Ohno
- S. Temin
- B. Poirier
Citations in the corpus
- Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer: the SN FNAC study. (2015, result): “Twofold decreases in the FNR have been previously reported with the use of dual tracers in similar settings.(13,14) The use of a single tracer using blue dye alone was not permitted in the this study.”
- Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. (2014, methodology): “For example, the ACOSOG Z1071 trial found FNRs 12% when only two SLNs were removed.(40) There were FNRs of 31% if only one SLN was removed and 20% for single-agent lymphatic mapping (isotope or dye alone).”
- Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. (2015, result): “The recently published SENTINA and ACOSOG Z1071 studies demonstrated lower detection rates and higher rates of false-negatives when SLNB is carried out after systemic therapy, compared with SNLB that is carried out before neoadjuvant chemotherapy [14, 15].”
- Long-Term Prognostic Risk After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Associated With Residual Cancer Burden and Breast Cancer Subtype. (2017, neutral): “All All Local event 9 (4) 18 (7) 7 (2) 34 (4) 8 (6) 0 3 (2) 45 (4) RFS event 65 (30) 86 (33) 90 (26) 241 (29) 52 (39) 29 (14) 14 (7) 336 (29) Distant event 49 (22) 71 (27) 67 (20) 187 (23) 40 (30) 28 (14) 11 (5) 230 (20) Deceased 51 (23) 72 (28) 63 (18) 186 (23) 45 (34) 17 (8) 10 (5) 258 (22) Median”