Building Consensus Using the Policy Delphi Method
By M. K. Rayens, E. Hahn. 2000
461 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8306ff892331323fb19ee83750b10c4884c51993
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Sociology and Political Science
- Inga-Lena Darkow
- Heiko A. Gracht
- Lefkothea Giannarou
- E. Zervas
- C. Markmann
- Stuart J. Barnes
- Jan Mattsson
Citations in the corpus
- A Delphi-based risk analysis — Identifying and assessing future challenges for supply chain security in a multi-stakeholder environment (2013, background): “While themajority of Delphi studies concentrate on consensus among the expert panel on a certain topic [64,65], dissent is equally valuable for data interpretation [28,62,66,67], especially in the context of terrorism [68] or policy making [69].”
- Consensus measurement in Delphi studies (2012, methodology): “Unfortunately, consensus is one of the most contentious components of the Delphi method, and its measurement greatly varies [20–22].”
- Using Delphi technique to build consensus in practice (2014, methodology): “…(which according to Hackett et al., 2006, is between values 4 and 5 on a 5-Likert scale), (ii) the interquartile range below 1 (Raskin, 1994; Rayens & Hahn, 2000: 311) and (iii) the standard deviation below 1.5 (Christie & Barela, 2005) To prove the need of this combinatory use, the…”