The STC System for the CHiME-6 Challenge

By Ivan Medennikov, M. Korenevsky, Tatiana Prisyach, Yuri Y. Khokhlov, Mariya Korenevskaya, Ivan Sorokin, Tatiana Timofeeva, Anton Mitrofanov, Andrei Andrusenko, Ivan Podluzhny and 2 more. 2020

60 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper is a description of the Speech Technology Center (STC) systems for the CHiME-6 challenge aimed at multi-microphone multi-speaker speech recognition and diarization in a dinner party scenario. We participated in both Track 1 and Track 2 and submitted our results for Ranking A as well as Ranking B for each track. The soft-activity based Guided Source Separation (GSS) as a front-end and a combination of advanced acoustic modeling techniques such as GSS-based training data augmentation, multi-stride and multi-stream self-attention layers, statistics layer and SpecAugment, as well as the lattice-level fusion of acoustic models were applied in the 1st track system. Our system for Track 1 was in the top three systems, achieving 30% relative WER reduction over the baseline. Additionally, lattice rescoring with a neural language model was applied for Ranking B. Overall, this led to 34% relative WER reduction over the baseline in Track 1. For Track 2, we proposed a novel Target-Speaker Voice Activity Detection (TS-VAD) approach to solve the diarization problem. Good diarization results made it possible to perform GSS on the obtained segments. TS-VAD is based on i-vector speaker embeddings, which are initially estimated using a strong diarization system based on spectral clustering of x-vectors. The back-end from the Track 1 system was used in the second track. The system for Track 2 demonstrated state-of-the-art performance, outperforming the baseline by 39% DER, 45% JER, 43% WER (Ranking A) and 45% WER (Ranking B) relative.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. Andrei Andrusenko
  2. Aleksandr Laptev
  3. Ivan Medennikov

Citations in the corpus