European Banking : Efficiency, Technology and Growth

By John Goddard, Phil Molyneux, John O. S. Wilson. 2001

274 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/82feefe02588698c48fabfc206bc6d9c5222950b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Productivity Growth in the Greek Banking Industry: A Non-Parametric Approach (2006, background): “The papers by Berger and Humphrey (1997) and Goddard et al. (2001) provide an extensive review of the literature on the efficiency and productivity of financial institutions.”
Regulatory Reform and Productivity Change in Indian Banking (2013, background): “Table 1 gives a snapshot of the relative weight of the three ownership categories and how the sample relates to the total mar6 For a review of the early literature, see reviews by Berger and Humphrey (1997) and Goddard et al. (2001).”
Bank Concentration and Competition: An Evolution in the Making (2004, methodology): “These studies typically found that significant differences across nations in markets and bank behavior and performance remain (e.g., Goddard, Molyneux, and Wilson, 2001, Dermine, 2003).”
International evidence on the impact of regulations and supervision on banks’ technical efficiency: an application of two-stage data envelopment analysis (2007, unknown): “1 Berger and Humphrey (1997) and Goddard et al. (2001) provide key discussions and comparison of these methods.”
Banking Sector Performance in Latin America: Market Power Versus Efficiency (2011, background): “The results, however, appear mixed and there is no conclusive evidence to indicate the superiority of one model over the other (e.g., Gilbert, 1984; Goddard et al., 2001).”
Bank supervision, regulation, and efficiency: evidence from the European Union (2012, result): “Overall, the results show relatively high average technical inefficiency levels of about 15%, which is broadly in accordance with previous bank efficiency studies covering Europe (e.g. Goddard et al., 2001; Lozano-Vivas et al., 2002; Casu and Molyneux, 2003).”
Bank Competition, Concentration and Efficiency in the Single European Market (2006, unknown): “contestability may depend on the extent of potential competition (see also Goddard et al., 2001: 81 )”
Estimating the technical and scale efficiency of Greek commercial banks: The impact of credit risk, off-balance sheet activities, and international operations (2008, background): “…efficiency of banks, such as Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA), Thick 8 Frontier Approach (TFA), Distribution Free Approach (DFA), and DEA. Berger et al (1993), Berger and Humphrey (1997) and Goddard et al. (2001) provide key discussions and comparison of these methods in the context of banking.”
Determinants of profitability of domestic UK commercial banks: panel evidence from the period 1995-2002 (2005, background): “However, not all studies have found evidence to support 4 Collusion may result in higher interest rates spread (e.g. higher interest rates being charged on loans and less interest rates being paid on deposits), higher fees being charged and so on (Goddard et al., 2001). the SCP hypothesis.”
Profitability of the Korean Banking Sector: Panel Evidence on Bank-Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants (2011, background): “According to the industrial organization literature, a positive impact is expected under both views, i.e., the collusion versus the efficiency views (Goddard et al., 2001).”
The profitability of banks in Japan (2010, unknown): “Useful reviews of previous work in this area include Goddard et al. (2001, 2007), Degryse and Ongena (2008) and Dick and Hannan (2010). consistent Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimator for this model.”