Assessing the risk of potentially invasive plant species in central Europe

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A success story: water primroses, aquatic plant pests (2013, unknown): “, 2010), Germany (Nehring and Kolthoff, 2011) and Switzerland (Weber and Gut, 2004).”
Risk analysis of potential invasive plants in Spain (2010, methodology): “ Weber and Gut (2004) proposed a rating system to assess the invasion potential of non-native plant species according to the specific needs for central Europe.”
A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species' traits and environment (2012, background): “…of information available from screening systems addressing invasiveness (e.g. Pheloung et al., 1999; Daehler & Carino, 2000; Daehler et al., 2004; Weber & Gut, 2004; Gordon et al., 2008) would be also applicable to impact which is, from themanagement point of view, amore importantmeasure (Hulme,…”